SearchsearchUseruser

Bruckner: Symphonies 4, 5 & 6 - Karajan

Bruckner: Symphonies 4, 5 & 6 - Karajan

Universal (Japan)  UCGG-9112/4 (3 discs)

Stereo Single Layer

Classical - Orchestral


Bruckner: Symphonies 4-6

Berliner Philharmoniker
Herbert von Karajan (conductor)

Add to your wish list | library

 

4 of 5 recommend this, would you recommend it?  yes | no

All
hide
Recording
Analogue recording
Comments (6)

Comment by Tony Reif - January 21, 2019 (1 of 6)

Would anyone care to comment on the sound quality of the 4th symphony, is it inferior to the other two? Note to Contrapunctus: Rainer Maillard confirms all 3 were transferred the same way from analog multi-track masters by the same engineer at the same time using the same equipment.

Comment by Contrapunctus - January 22, 2019 (2 of 6)

I hope that you're not disappointed if I try to answer your question, Tony.

In contrast to symphonies 5&6 on this set, the 4th symphony didn't sound better compared to regular CD releases. The overall sound is remarkably diffuse and distorted (reverb!). Perhaps the original recording of this symphony was not a masterpiece - I don't know. But there is one thing I don't understand: the CD of the 'Karajan complete 70's recordings' offers a cleaner sound with less (!) reverberation. For me, this CD sounds indeed 'better' than the SACD.

You've seen my corresponding review on JPC and that I don't recommend the whole set - mainly because of the price. On the other side: for lovers of Karajan's account (like me) of symphonies no. 5 & 6 this set is a must-have. Especially no. 5 is in my opinion a masterpiece - in terms of conducting, orchestral playing and recording.

Comment by Tony Reif - January 22, 2019 (3 of 6)

Very mysterious - the mastering chain is apparently the same as the other two but the result is different. Contrapunctus, you listen on headphones (as I do), so you're certainly hearing what's there. The credits for 7-9 just say "DSD mastering by EBS" - is it the same for 4-6? Herr Maillard mentions that the latter were mastered from the analogue multitracks. This implies that the mastering would have involved remixing. But these people know what they're doing, it's hard to believe that they would have made things worse than the original CD mastering, which probably used the analog 2-track master or even a duplicate - though the Karajan 70s box was supposedly completely remastered (by who?).

Comment by Contrapunctus - January 23, 2019 (4 of 6)

Tony, 'mysterious' is the appropriate word! - I'm really fond of many SHM-SACDs remastered by EBS and I honestly appreciate their (EBS) work. (Sadly and oddly Universal don't.)

Symphony No. 4: There's no doubt for me that EBS used analog tapes for the remastering and I also would believe in Rainer Maillard's statements. But I'm not sure if they really had the ORIGINAL tapes (and not a copy) available in their archives. Maybe I'm wrong. I can only repeat what I hear: this SACD sounds somehow different.

Remastering chain/working flow: after my knowledge EBS is doing the remastering for Universal Japan SHM-SACD always in the same way. Although indicated as 'DSD remastered by EBS' it's not a genuine DSD remastering. EBS first samples the tapes in PCM (24/192). After remixing they convert the PCM files to DSD for SACD production.

Karajan 70's box (CD): another 'mystery'. I don't know who the remastering did. But I highly doubt that EBS was involved. It's important to say that only CD with Bruckner 4 sounds 'better' compared to the SHM-SACD. In ALL other cases of this box the corresponding SHM-SACDs are worlds apart. So is also the SHM-SACD set of Bruckner 7-9 outstanding and very rewarding.

Comment by Tony Reif - January 23, 2019 (5 of 6)

Well, here's an inconsistency - Maillard says they used the multi-tracks in all cases, and by definition that almost certainly means they had access to the originals, because multi-tracks would not usually be duplicated once the record was mixed. And anyway I think a 1-generation loss would not account for the severity of what you hear (I mean, the diffuseness and additional reverberation). Maybe Rainer M. was not directly involved in this project and never heard the results. Perhaps you could contact him about this.

Anyone else want to comment on what they hear?

Btw, for those who reject PCM recordings and only support DSD, I would approve of EBS's approach, at least when they are working with multi-tracks, because it's a lot easier to mix in PCM, with more and better options for processing (EQ etc.) - though I guess DXD would be preferable to 24/192. The main problems with PCM are at the d/a stage (digital filters) but this is less of an issue with 192. I've heard lots of high-res PCM recordings that sound great, and not just on headphones but on a high-end 2-channel speaker system I'm familiar with. (And generally speaking, whatever the original HR release format is sounds the best, whether that's DSD, DXD or even 24/192.)

Comment by james_joyce - January 28, 2019 (6 of 6)

I've had this set for a few months and I really like it. I think all 3 symphonies sound better compared to the original RBCD releases that I've had for decades in all the ways you'd expect a hirez remastering to sound. And while I do a agree the 4th does sound a little more "difuse" and "reverberent" than then other two, I felt the same way about the RBCD version. Perhaps more interesting to me I find the 5th, esp. in the coda of the final movement, which is one of my favorite bits in the entire repertorie, is mixed much more in favor of the low brass at the expense of the trumpets, which I do not think is an improvement.